LRCU vs SCHD
Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. LRCU delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LRCU | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.30% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $49M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | -33.32% | +28.70% | |
| 1Y Return | +110.75% | +32.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 170.7% | 13.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -80.0% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Tradr ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 18, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
LRCU vs SCHD Performance
Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) is a ETF from Tradr ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year LRCU returned +110.75% while SCHD returned +32.27%. Year to date, LRCU is down 33.32% versus a gain of 28.70% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LRCU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 170.7% compared with 13.7% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.0% for LRCU and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.01. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LRCU charges 1.30% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $130 vs $6 annually, a gap of $124 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LRCU currently yields 0.00% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
LRCU and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 101 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LRCU or SCHD?
LRCU has an expense ratio of 1.30% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $124 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LRCU or SCHD?
Over the past year LRCU returned +110.75% vs +32.27% for SCHD, so LRCU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LRCU annualized +102.06% vs +11.63% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LRCU or SCHD?
LRCU has been the more volatile fund at 170.7% annualized versus 13.7% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: LRCU -80.0% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both LRCU and SCHD?
LRCU and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.01, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LRCU and SCHD?
LRCU and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 101 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LRCU or SCHD?
LRCU yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.