IVV vs METW
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | METW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.00% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $26M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 65.33% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | -31.60% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | -43.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 28.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -47.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Roundhill Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 18, 2025 |
IVV vs METW Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF (METW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while METW returned -43.17%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a loss of 31.60% for METW.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
METW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -47.1% for METW. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while METW charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $100 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 65.33% for METW.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and METW share 1 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in METW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| META | 2.19% | 23.53% | 21.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or METW?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while METW charges 1.00%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or METW?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs -43.17% for METW, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs -33.11% for METW. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or METW?
METW has been the more volatile fund at 28.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs METW -47.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and METW?
IVV and METW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and METW?
IVV and METW share 1 common holdings with a 2.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or METW?
IVV yields 1.10% while METW yields 65.33%, so METW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.