METW vs VXUS
Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | METW | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $26M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 66.10% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -23.11% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | -37.67% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
METW vs VXUS Performance
Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF (METW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year METW returned -37.67% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, METW is down 23.11% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
METW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.4% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.7% for METW and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
METW charges 0.99% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $5 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, METW currently yields 66.10% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
METW and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7863 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, METW or VXUS?
METW has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $94 per year of difference.
Which performed better, METW or VXUS?
Over the past year METW returned -37.67% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), METW annualized -26.78% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, METW or VXUS?
METW has been the more volatile fund at 30.4% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: METW -46.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both METW and VXUS?
METW and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between METW and VXUS?
METW and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7863 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, METW or VXUS?
METW yields 66.10% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so METW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.