METW vs VYM
Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | METW | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $26M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 66.10% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -25.79% | +16.53% | |
| 1Y Return | -42.33% | +25.03% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.25% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.4% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
METW vs VYM Performance
Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF (METW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year METW returned -42.33% while VYM returned +25.03%. Year to date, METW is down 25.79% versus a gain of 16.53% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
METW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.4% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.7% for METW and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
METW charges 0.99% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $4 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, METW currently yields 66.10% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
METW and VYM share 0 holdings out of 560 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, METW or VYM?
METW has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $95 per year of difference.
Which performed better, METW or VYM?
Over the past year METW returned -42.33% vs +25.03% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), METW annualized -28.74% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, METW or VYM?
METW has been the more volatile fund at 29.4% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: METW -46.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both METW and VYM?
METW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between METW and VYM?
METW and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 560 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, METW or VYM?
METW yields 66.10% while VYM yields 2.86%, so METW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.