IVV vs MNRS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MNRS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $11M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.47% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 27 | |
| YTD Return | +13.22% | +1.92% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.62% | +20.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.17% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.42% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 74.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -56.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Grayscale | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 30, 2025 |
IVV vs MNRS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) is a ETF from Grayscale. Over the past year IVV returned +21.62% while MNRS returned +20.90%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.22% versus a gain of 1.92% for MNRS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MNRS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 74.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -56.7% for MNRS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MNRS charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.47% for MNRS.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MNRS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MNRS charges 0.59%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MNRS?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.62% vs +20.90% for MNRS, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.02% vs +15.10% for MNRS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MNRS?
MNRS has been the more volatile fund at 74.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MNRS -56.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and MNRS?
IVV and MNRS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MNRS?
IVV and MNRS share 2 common holdings with a 4.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 529 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MNRS?
IVV yields 1.10% while MNRS yields 0.47%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.