MNRS vs SCHD
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MNRS | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $11M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +0.43% | +26.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.57% | +31.25% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.10% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 74.9% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.7% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Grayscale | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
MNRS vs SCHD Performance
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) is a ETF from Grayscale and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year MNRS returned +13.57% while SCHD returned +31.25%. Year to date, MNRS is up 0.43% versus a gain of 26.50% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MNRS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 74.9% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.7% for MNRS and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.02. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MNRS charges 0.59% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $6 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MNRS currently yields 0.47% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
MNRS and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 126 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MNRS or SCHD?
MNRS has an expense ratio of 0.59% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $53 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MNRS or SCHD?
Over the past year MNRS returned +13.57% vs +31.25% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MNRS annualized +14.04% vs +11.50% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MNRS or SCHD?
MNRS has been the more volatile fund at 74.9% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: MNRS -56.7% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both MNRS and SCHD?
MNRS and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.02, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MNRS and SCHD?
MNRS and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 126 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MNRS or SCHD?
MNRS yields 0.47% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.