MNRS vs VXUS
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MNRS | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $11M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +5.84% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.48% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 74.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Grayscale | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
MNRS vs VXUS Performance
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) is a ETF from Grayscale and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MNRS returned +23.48% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, MNRS is up 5.84% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MNRS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 74.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.7% for MNRS and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MNRS charges 0.59% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $5 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MNRS currently yields 0.47% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
MNRS and VXUS share 3 holdings out of 7892 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MNRS or VXUS?
MNRS has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MNRS or VXUS?
Over the past year MNRS returned +23.48% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MNRS annualized +18.11% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MNRS or VXUS?
MNRS has been the more volatile fund at 74.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: MNRS -56.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both MNRS and VXUS?
MNRS and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MNRS and VXUS?
MNRS and VXUS share 3 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7892 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MNRS or VXUS?
MNRS yields 0.47% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.