MNRS vs VXUS
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, MNRS or VXUS?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. MNRS led over 1Y, VXUS over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MNRS | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $10M | $164.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 27 | 8,844 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 73.8% | 11.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -56.7% | -13.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $14,338 | $14,612Best |
| Fund Family | Grayscale | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 10 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. MNRS has data through Sep 21, 2026 and VXUS through Oct 1, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 30, 2025 to Sep 21, 2026 (1.6 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MNRS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 73.8% compared with 11.5% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.7% for MNRS and -13.6% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MNRS charges 0.59% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $5 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MNRS currently yields 0.47% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 7.9% of MNRS's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 89.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
MNRS and VXUS share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in MNRS and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 27 and 8,844.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MNRS and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MNRS or VXUS?
MNRS has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, MNRS or VXUS?
MNRS has been the more volatile fund at 73.8% annualized versus 11.5% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: MNRS -56.7% vs VXUS -13.6%.
Should I hold both MNRS and VXUS?
MNRS and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MNRS and VXUS?
At least 7.9% of MNRS's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in MNRS and 8,082 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, MNRS or VXUS?
MNRS yields 0.47% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than MNRS?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. MNRS led over 1Y, VXUS over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.