IVV vs MTRA
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco International Growth Focus ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MTRA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.54% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $138M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.54% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 68 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +2.01% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +10.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -15.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 11, 2025 |
IVV vs MTRA Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco International Growth Focus ETF (MTRA) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while MTRA returned +10.16%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 2.01% for MTRA.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.4% for MTRA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -15.8% for MTRA. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MTRA charges 0.54%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $54 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.54% for MTRA.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MTRA share 1 holdings out of 562 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in MTRA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BKNG | 0.21% | 1.28% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MTRA?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MTRA charges 0.54%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MTRA?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +10.16% for MTRA, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +6.74% for MTRA. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MTRA?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.4% for MTRA. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MTRA -15.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and MTRA?
IVV and MTRA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MTRA?
IVV and MTRA share 1 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 562 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MTRA?
IVV yields 1.09% while MTRA yields 0.54%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.