MTRA vs SCHD
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MTRA | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $138M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.54% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 68 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +2.41% | +24.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.33% | +31.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.8% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
MTRA vs SCHD Performance
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF (MTRA) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year MTRA returned +9.33% while SCHD returned +31.38%. Year to date, MTRA is up 2.41% versus a gain of 24.26% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 13.5% for MTRA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.8% for MTRA and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.13. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MTRA charges 0.54% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $6 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MTRA currently yields 0.54% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
MTRA and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 158 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MTRA or SCHD?
MTRA has an expense ratio of 0.54% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $48 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MTRA or SCHD?
Over the past year MTRA returned +9.33% vs +31.38% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), MTRA annualized +7.14% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MTRA or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 13.5% for MTRA. Worst drawdown: MTRA -15.8% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both MTRA and SCHD?
MTRA and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.13, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MTRA and SCHD?
MTRA and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 158 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MTRA or SCHD?
MTRA yields 0.54% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.