IVV vs MVFG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained Index ETF
Which is better, IVV or MVFG?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MVFG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.41% |
| AUM | $882.6B | $181M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.51% |
| Holdings | 508 | 24 |
| YTD Return | +12.76%Best | +5.40% |
| 1Y Return | +15.57%Best | +7.80% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.95% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.54% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.9%Best | 13.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -15.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $15,435Best | $13,909 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.1%Best | 44.8% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Monarch Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 12, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 7, 2024 to Oct 1, 2026 (2.6 years).
IVV vs MVFG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs MVFG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained Index ETF (MVFG) is an ETF from Monarch Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +15.57% while MVFG returned +7.80%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.76% versus a gain of 5.40% for MVFG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MVFG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.0% compared with 11.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -15.3% for MVFG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MVFG charges 1.41%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $141 annually, a gap of $138 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.51% for MVFG.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 505 holdings in IVV and 24 in MVFG, totalling 99.9% and 99.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 24 in MVFG, against full books of 508 and 24.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 505 and 24 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 497 positions MVFG does not, 99.3% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.00%, AAPL 7.39%, MSFT 5.57%, AMZN 3.80%, GOOGL 3.00%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and MVFG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MVFG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MVFG charges 1.41%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $138 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or MVFG?
Over the past year IVV returned +15.57% vs +7.80% for MVFG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or MVFG?
MVFG has been the more volatile fund at 13.0% annualized versus 11.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs MVFG -15.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and MVFG?
IVV and MVFG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MVFG?
IVV yields 1.06% while MVFG yields 1.51%, so MVFG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MVFG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.