IVV vs MVFG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained Index ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. MVFG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MVFG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.42% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $179M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.53% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 27 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +11.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +23.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -15.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Monarch Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 12, 2024 |
IVV vs MVFG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained Index ETF (MVFG) is a ETF from Monarch Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while MVFG returned +23.22%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 11.31% for MVFG.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.0% for MVFG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -15.3% for MVFG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MVFG charges 1.42%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $142 annually, a gap of $139 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.53% for MVFG.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MVFG share 0 holdings out of 528 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MVFG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MVFG charges 1.42%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $139 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MVFG?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +23.22% for MVFG, so MVFG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +16.93% for MVFG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MVFG?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.0% for MVFG. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MVFG -15.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and MVFG?
IVV and MVFG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MVFG?
IVV and MVFG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 528 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MVFG?
IVV yields 1.09% while MVFG yields 1.53%, so MVFG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.