MVFG vs VYM
Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained Index ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MVFG | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.42% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $179M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.53% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +10.86% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.36% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Monarch Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 12, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
MVFG vs VYM Performance
Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained Index ETF (MVFG) is a ETF from Monarch Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MVFG returned +24.36% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, MVFG is up 10.86% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 12.9% for MVFG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.3% for MVFG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MVFG charges 1.42% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $142 vs $4 annually, a gap of $138 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MVFG currently yields 1.53% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
MVFG and VYM share 1 holdings out of 580 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MVFG | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FNF | 3.91% | 0.06% | 3.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MVFG or VYM?
MVFG has an expense ratio of 1.42% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $138 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MVFG or VYM?
Over the past year MVFG returned +24.36% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MVFG annualized +16.76% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MVFG or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 12.9% for MVFG. Worst drawdown: MVFG -15.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both MVFG and VYM?
MVFG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MVFG and VYM?
MVFG and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 580 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MVFG or VYM?
MVFG yields 1.53% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.