IVV vs NFXL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NFXL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.05% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $155M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 12.94% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 10 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | -34.39% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | -65.81% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 72.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -80.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 3, 2024 |
IVV vs NFXL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X ETF (NFXL) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while NFXL returned -65.81%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a loss of 34.39% for NFXL.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NFXL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 72.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -80.3% for NFXL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.15. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NFXL charges 1.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $105 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 12.94% for NFXL.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and NFXL share 1 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in NFXL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NFLX | 0.45% | 18.83% | 18.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NFXL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NFXL charges 1.05%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $102 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NFXL?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs -65.81% for NFXL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs -10.19% for NFXL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NFXL?
NFXL has been the more volatile fund at 72.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NFXL -80.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and NFXL?
IVV and NFXL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.15, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NFXL?
IVV and NFXL share 1 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NFXL?
IVV yields 1.10% while NFXL yields 12.94%, so NFXL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.