IVV vs OAEM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. OAEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | OAEM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.25% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $125M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.57% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 45 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +29.74% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +47.03% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 18.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -17.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | OneAscent Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 14, 2022 |
IVV vs OAEM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) is a ETF from OneAscent Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while OAEM returned +47.03%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 29.74% for OAEM.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.55% per year against +21.77% for OAEM. Across the full 4-year window we track, OAEM has the edge at +20.04% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OAEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -17.1% for OAEM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while OAEM charges 1.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $125 annually, a gap of $122 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.57% for OAEM.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and OAEM share 0 holdings out of 548 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or OAEM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while OAEM charges 1.25%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $122 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or OAEM?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +47.03% for OAEM, so OAEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +20.04% for OAEM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or OAEM?
OAEM has been the more volatile fund at 18.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs OAEM -17.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and OAEM?
IVV and OAEM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and OAEM?
IVV and OAEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 548 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or OAEM?
IVV yields 1.09% while OAEM yields 0.57%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.