OAEM vs VYM
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, OAEM or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. OAEM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OAEM | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.25% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $132M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.58% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 49 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +35.14%Best | +13.75% |
| 1Y Return | +53.80%Best | +19.42% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.52%Best | +18.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.17% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -17.1% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 4 years | $21,330Best | $17,784 |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.1% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | OneAscent Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 14, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2022 to Sep 9, 2026 (4 years).
OAEM vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4 years both funds cover.
OAEM vs VYM Performance
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) is an ETF from OneAscent Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OAEM returned +53.80% while VYM returned +19.42%. Year to date, OAEM is up 35.14% versus a gain of 13.75% for VYM.
Over three years, OAEM compounded at +23.52% per year against +18.22% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, OAEM has the edge at +20.85% annualized vs +15.48%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OAEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 12.7% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.1% for OAEM and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OAEM charges 1.25% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $125 vs $4 annually, a gap of $121 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OAEM currently yields 0.58% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
3.1% of OAEM's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.1% of VYM's money is in holdings OAEM also owns.
OAEM and VYM share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, OAEM as of Aug 18, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
2 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in OAEM and 603 in VYM, against full books of 49 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 567 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for OAEM (97.3% of the fund), and 1 for OAEM that do not appear in VYM (0.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of OAEM and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OAEM or VYM?
OAEM has an expense ratio of 1.25% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $121 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OAEM or VYM?
Over the past year OAEM returned +53.80% vs +19.42% for VYM, so OAEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), OAEM annualized +20.85% vs +15.48% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OAEM or VYM?
OAEM has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 12.7% for VYM. Worst drawdown: OAEM -17.1% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both OAEM and VYM?
OAEM and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between OAEM and VYM?
3.1% of OAEM's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.1% of VYM's is in holdings OAEM also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in OAEM and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, OAEM or VYM?
OAEM yields 0.58% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than OAEM?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. OAEM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.