IVV vs PQNT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Pictet AI Enhanced International Equity ETF
Which is better, IVV or PQNT?
Large Cap Blend against All Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. PQNT is less concentrated, with 15.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PQNT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.30% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.36% |
| Holdings | 508 | 307 |
| YTD Return | +11.57%Best | +9.01% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | +14.96% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 15.3%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pictet Asset Management Ltd. (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | All Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 15, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs PQNT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs PQNT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pictet AI Enhanced International Equity ETF (PQNT) is an ETF from Pictet Asset Management Ltd. (US). Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while PQNT returned +14.96%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 9.01% for PQNT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PQNT charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $30 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.36% for PQNT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 505 holdings in IVV and 294 in PQNT, totalling 100.0% and 99.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 294 in PQNT, against full books of 508 and 307.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 4 positions for PQNT that do not appear in our book for IVV (1.9% of the fund), and 495 for IVV that do not appear in PQNT (99.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and PQNT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PQNT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PQNT charges 0.30%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or PQNT?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +14.96% for PQNT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PQNT?
IVV yields 1.06% while PQNT yields 0.36%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PQNT better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. PQNT is less concentrated, with 15.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.