PQNT vs VYM
Pictet AI Enhanced International Equity ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, PQNT or VYM?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. PQNT is less concentrated, with 15.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PQNT | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $12M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 307 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +9.01% | +13.15%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.96% | +17.82%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.99% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.16% |
| Top 10 Weight | 15.3%Best | 25.9% |
| Fund Family | Pictet Asset Management Ltd. (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
PQNT vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PQNT vs VYM Performance
Pictet AI Enhanced International Equity ETF (PQNT) is an ETF from Pictet Asset Management Ltd. (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PQNT returned +14.96% while VYM returned +17.82%. Year to date, PQNT is up 9.01% versus a gain of 13.15% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PQNT charges 0.30% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $4 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PQNT currently yields 0.36% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of PQNT's money is in holdings VYM also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, PQNT as of Aug 18, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 294 positions we hold weights for in PQNT and 603 in VYM, against full books of 307 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 568 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for PQNT (97.5% of the fund), and 4 for PQNT that do not appear in VYM (1.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PQNT | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIG:AUSigma Pharmaceuticals Ltd | 0.08% | 0.01% | 0.07% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PQNT and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PQNT or VYM?
PQNT has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PQNT or VYM?
Over the past year PQNT returned +14.96% vs +17.82% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PQNT or VYM?
PQNT yields 0.36% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than PQNT?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. PQNT is less concentrated, with 15.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.