PQNT vs SCHD
Pictet AI Enhanced International Equity ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, PQNT or SCHD?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y. PQNT is less concentrated, with 15.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PQNT | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $12M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 307 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +9.01% | +24.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.96% | +28.14%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.58% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.90% |
| Top 10 Weight | 15.3%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | Pictet Asset Management Ltd. (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
PQNT vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PQNT vs SCHD Performance
Pictet AI Enhanced International Equity ETF (PQNT) is an ETF from Pictet Asset Management Ltd. (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year PQNT returned +14.96% while SCHD returned +28.14%. Year to date, PQNT is up 9.01% versus a gain of 24.59% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PQNT charges 0.30% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $6 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PQNT currently yields 0.36% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 294 holdings in PQNT and 100 in SCHD, totalling 99.8% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 294 positions we hold weights for in PQNT and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 307 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 99 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for PQNT (99.9% of the fund), and 4 for PQNT that do not appear in SCHD (1.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PQNT and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PQNT or SCHD?
PQNT has an expense ratio of 0.30% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PQNT or SCHD?
Over the past year PQNT returned +14.96% vs +28.14% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PQNT or SCHD?
PQNT yields 0.36% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than PQNT?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y. PQNT is less concentrated, with 15.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.