IVV vs PRTO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF
Which is better, IVV or PRTO?
Large Cap Blend against Tactical Allocation.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 90.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PRTO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.82% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $17M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 20 |
| YTD Return | +11.51%Best | +8.59% |
| 1Y Return | +15.96% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.01% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.66% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 90.7% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | RCN Wealth Advisors, Inc. |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Tactical Allocation |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 24, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs PRTO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs PRTO Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF (PRTO) is an ETF from RCN Wealth Advisors, Inc.. Year to date, IVV is up 11.51% versus a gain of 8.59% for PRTO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PRTO charges 0.82%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $82 annually, a gap of $79 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for PRTO.
Holdings Overlap
0.9% of IVV's money is in holdings PRTO also owns. 4.5% of PRTO's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
PRTO and IVV share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 19 in PRTO, against full books of 508 and 20.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 490 and 19 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 478 positions PRTO does not, 97.7% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.07%, AAPL 7.02%, MSFT 5.69%, AMZN 3.84%, GOOGL 3.00%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and PRTO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PRTO?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PRTO charges 0.82%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $79 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PRTO?
4.5% of PRTO's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 4.5% of PRTO's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 19 in PRTO.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PRTO?
IVV yields 1.06% while PRTO yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PRTO better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 90.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.