IVV vs PSOX
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Tema MLCC & PowerSemi ETF
Which is better, IVV or PSOX?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 68.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PSOX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $882.6B | $5M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 42 |
| YTD Return | +13.60% | +16.03%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.32% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.81% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.03% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.1%Best | 68.3% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Tema Global Limited |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 17, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs PSOX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs PSOX Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Tema MLCC & PowerSemi ETF (PSOX) is an ETF from Tema Global Limited. Year to date, IVV is up 13.60% versus a gain of 16.03% for PSOX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PSOX charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for PSOX.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings PSOX also owns. 3.9% of PSOX's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
PSOX and IVV share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 22 in PSOX, against full books of 508 and 42.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 5 positions for PSOX that do not appear in our book for IVV (17.6% of the fund), and 496 for IVV that do not appear in PSOX (99.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in PSOX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 0.09% | 3.90% | 3.81% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and PSOX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PSOX?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PSOX charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PSOX?
3.9% of PSOX's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 3.9% of PSOX's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 22 in PSOX.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PSOX?
IVV yields 1.06% while PSOX yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PSOX better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 68.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.