IVV vs PSP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PSP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.80% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $230M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 6.40% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 73 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | -1.88% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | -4.65% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +12.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | +0.93% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 25.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -87.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 24, 2006 |
IVV vs PSP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while PSP returned -4.65%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a loss of 1.88% for PSP.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against +12.81% for PSP; over five years the annualized figures are +13.37% and +0.93% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs -1.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -87.1% for PSP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PSP charges 1.80%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $180 annually, a gap of $177 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 6.40% for PSP.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PSP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PSP charges 1.80%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $177 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PSP?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs -4.65% for PSP, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs -1.66% for PSP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PSP?
PSP has been the more volatile fund at 25.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PSP -87.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and PSP?
IVV and PSP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PSP?
IVV and PSP share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 567 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PSP?
IVV yields 1.09% while PSP yields 6.40%, so PSP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.