PSP vs VYM

PSP vs VYM

Which is better, PSP or VYM?

Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.8%.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPSPVYM
Expense Ratio1.80%0.04%Best
AUM$242M$81.6B
Dividend Yield5.98%2.22%
Holdings75613
YTD Return-9.55%+13.15%Best
1Y Return-10.84%+17.82%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+9.96%+17.99%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-0.32%+12.16%Best
Volatility (annualized)25.4%14.5%Best
Max Drawdown-87.1%-58.8%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$9,841$17,750Best
Top 10 Weight48.8%25.9%Best
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Value
InceptionOct 24, 2006Nov 10, 2006

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2006 to Sep 10, 2026 (19.8 years).

PSP vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.8 years both funds cover.

PSP vs VYM Performance

Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSP returned -10.84% while VYM returned +17.82%. Year to date, PSP is down 9.55% versus a gain of 13.15% for VYM.

Over three years, PSP compounded at +9.96% per year against +17.99% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -0.32% and +12.16% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.91% annualized vs -2.26%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

PSP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.4% compared with 14.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -87.1% for PSP and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PSP charges 1.80% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $180 vs $4 annually, a gap of $176 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSP currently yields 5.98% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

PSP already in VYM23.6%
VYM already in PSP0.6%

23.6% of PSP's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.6% of VYM's money is in holdings PSP also owns.

PSP and VYM share little of their money.

7 positions in common, counted across the 66 positions we hold weights for in PSP and 603 in VYM, against full books of 75 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 561 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for PSP (96.9% of the fund), and 26 for PSP that do not appear in VYM (22.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PSPWeight in VYMDifference
BXBlackstone Group Inc/the Common Stock5.19%0.36%4.83%
TPGTpg Inc5.14%0.02%5.12%
OWLBlue Owl Capital, Inc. Class A4.57%0.02%4.55%
CGCarlyle Group Lp Mlp Usd1.03.18%0.05%3.13%
RFRegions Financial Corp.2.12%0.11%2.01%
HLNEHamilton Lane Inc1.72%0.01%1.71%
STEPStepstone 'A'1.72%0.01%1.71%

23.6% of PSP is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

PSPVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PSP or VYM?

PSP has an expense ratio of 1.80% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $176 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, PSP or VYM?

Over the past year PSP returned -10.84% vs +17.82% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), PSP annualized -2.26% vs +6.91% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PSP or VYM?

PSP has been the more volatile fund at 25.4% annualized versus 14.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PSP -87.1% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both PSP and VYM?

PSP and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between PSP and VYM?

23.6% of PSP's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.6% of VYM's is in holdings PSP also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 66 positions we hold weights for in PSP and 603 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, PSP or VYM?

PSP yields 5.98% while VYM yields 2.22%, so PSP currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than PSP?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.