PSP vs SCHD

PSP vs SCHD

Which is better, PSP or SCHD?

Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.8%.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns: SCHDLess Concentrated: SCHD

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPSPSCHD
Expense Ratio1.80%0.06%Best
AUM$242M$112.1B
Dividend Yield5.98%3.00%
Holdings75103
YTD Return-9.55%+24.59%Best
1Y Return-10.84%+28.14%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+9.96%+15.58%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-0.32%+9.90%Best
Volatility (annualized)20.8%13.6%Best
Max Drawdown-49.9%-33.4%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$9,841$16,032Best
Top 10 Weight48.8%41.8%Best
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Charles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Value
InceptionOct 24, 2006Oct 20, 2011

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2011 to Sep 10, 2026 (14.9 years).

PSP vs SCHD growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.9 years both funds cover.

PSP vs SCHD Performance

Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year PSP returned -10.84% while SCHD returned +28.14%. Year to date, PSP is down 9.55% versus a gain of 24.59% for SCHD.

Over three years, PSP compounded at +9.96% per year against +15.58% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are -0.32% and +9.90% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.34% annualized vs +4.89%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

PSP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.8% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.9% for PSP and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PSP charges 1.80% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $180 vs $6 annually, a gap of $174 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSP currently yields 5.98% against 3.00% for SCHD.

Holdings Overlap

PSP already in SCHD7.3%
SCHD already in PSP3.2%

7.3% of PSP's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 3.2% of SCHD's money is in holdings PSP also owns.

PSP and SCHD share little of their money.

2 positions in common, counted across the 66 positions we hold weights for in PSP and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 75 and 103.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 97 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for PSP (96.7% of the fund), and 31 for PSP that do not appear in SCHD (38.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PSPWeight in SCHDDifference
BXBlackstone Group Inc/the Common Stock5.19%2.59%2.60%
RFRegions Financial Corp.2.12%0.62%1.50%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of PSP and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

PSPSCHD

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PSP or SCHD?

PSP has an expense ratio of 1.80% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $174 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, PSP or SCHD?

Over the past year PSP returned -10.84% vs +28.14% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), PSP annualized +4.89% vs +11.34% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PSP or SCHD?

PSP has been the more volatile fund at 20.8% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: PSP -49.9% vs SCHD -33.4%.

Should I hold both PSP and SCHD?

PSP and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between PSP and SCHD?

7.3% of PSP's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 3.2% of SCHD's is in holdings PSP also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 66 positions we hold weights for in PSP and 100 in SCHD.

Which pays a higher dividend, PSP or SCHD?

PSP yields 5.98% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so PSP currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SCHD better than PSP?

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.