IVV vs PTEU
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PTEU | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $36M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.76% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 293 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +11.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +20.28% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +11.44% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | +8.08% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -35.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pacer ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 14, 2015 |
IVV vs PTEU Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF (PTEU) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while PTEU returned +20.28%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 11.26% for PTEU.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +11.44% for PTEU; over five years the annualized figures are +13.26% and +8.08% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +4.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.2% for PTEU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -35.5% for PTEU. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PTEU charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.76% for PTEU.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and PTEU share 2 holdings out of 783 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PTEU?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PTEU charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PTEU?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +20.28% for PTEU, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +4.48% for PTEU. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PTEU?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.2% for PTEU. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PTEU -35.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and PTEU?
IVV and PTEU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PTEU?
IVV and PTEU share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 783 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PTEU?
IVV yields 1.09% while PTEU yields 1.76%, so PTEU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.