IVV vs PTEU
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF
Which is better, IVV or PTEU?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. PTEU is less concentrated, with 28.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PTEU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $38M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.74% |
| Holdings | 508 | 290 |
| YTD Return | +13.39%Best | +9.33% |
| 1Y Return | +20.08%Best | +18.32% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.29%Best | +12.03% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88%Best | +7.45% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -35.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,327Best | $14,323 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 28.6%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 14, 2015 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 15, 2015 to Sep 4, 2026 (10.7 years).
IVV vs PTEU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.7 years both funds cover.
IVV vs PTEU Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF (PTEU) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% while PTEU returned +18.32%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.39% versus a gain of 9.33% for PTEU.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.29% per year against +12.03% for PTEU; over five years the annualized figures are +12.88% and +7.45% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.94% annualized vs +4.28%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.1% for PTEU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -35.5% for PTEU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PTEU charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.74% for PTEU.
Holdings Overlap
0.5% of IVV's money is in holdings PTEU also owns. 0.3% of PTEU's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 284 in PTEU, against full books of 508 and 290.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 9 positions for PTEU that do not appear in our book for IVV (3.4% of the fund), and 496 for IVV that do not appear in PTEU (98.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in PTEU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.48% | 0.27% | 0.21% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and PTEU you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PTEU?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PTEU charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or PTEU?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% vs +18.32% for PTEU, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), IVV annualized +13.94% vs +4.28% for PTEU. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or PTEU?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.1% for PTEU. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs PTEU -35.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and PTEU?
IVV and PTEU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PTEU?
IVV yields 1.10% while PTEU yields 1.74%, so PTEU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PTEU better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. PTEU is less concentrated, with 28.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.