IVV vs PTIR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PTIR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.04% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $279M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 16.53% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 2 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | -15.92% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | -38.98% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 147.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -79.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | GraniteShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 3, 2024 |
IVV vs PTIR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) is a ETF from GraniteShares. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while PTIR returned -38.98%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a loss of 15.92% for PTIR.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PTIR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 147.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -79.4% for PTIR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.27. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PTIR charges 1.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $104 annually, a gap of $101 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 16.53% for PTIR.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and PTIR share 1 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in PTIR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLTR | 0.47% | 66.68% | 66.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PTIR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PTIR charges 1.04%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $101 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PTIR?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs -38.98% for PTIR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +269.75% for PTIR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PTIR?
PTIR has been the more volatile fund at 147.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PTIR -79.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and PTIR?
IVV and PTIR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.27, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PTIR?
IVV and PTIR share 1 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PTIR?
IVV yields 1.09% while PTIR yields 16.53%, so PTIR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.