PTIR vs VXUS

PTIR vs VXUS

Which is better, PTIR or VXUS?

Leverage Strategy against Large Cap Blend.

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. PTIR led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y.

Lower Fees: VXUSHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPTIRVXUS
Expense Ratio1.04%0.05%Best
AUM$352M$158.1B
Dividend Yield7.25%2.51%
Holdings28,747
YTD Return-20.84%+13.64%Best
1Y Return-29.00%+20.82%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+19.58%
5Y Return (annualized)-+9.14%
Volatility (annualized)150.4%12.1%Best
Max Drawdown-79.4%-13.6%Best
$10,000 over 2 years$113,906Best$14,677
Fund FamilyGraniteSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleLeverage StrategyLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 3, 2024Jan 26, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 4, 2024 to Sep 17, 2026 (2 years).

PTIR vs VXUS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

PTIR vs VXUS Performance

GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PTIR returned -29.00% while VXUS returned +20.82%. Year to date, PTIR is down 20.84% versus a gain of 13.64% for VXUS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

PTIR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 150.4% compared with 12.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.4% for PTIR and -13.6% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.08. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PTIR charges 1.04% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $104 vs $5 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PTIR currently yields 7.25% against 2.51% for VXUS.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of PTIR and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

PTIRVXUS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PTIR or VXUS?

PTIR has an expense ratio of 1.04% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $99 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, PTIR or VXUS?

Over the past year PTIR returned -29.00% vs +20.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PTIR annualized +237.50% vs +21.15% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PTIR or VXUS?

PTIR has been the more volatile fund at 150.4% annualized versus 12.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: PTIR -79.4% vs VXUS -13.6%.

Should I hold both PTIR and VXUS?

PTIR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.08, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, PTIR or VXUS?

PTIR yields 7.25% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so PTIR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VXUS better than PTIR?

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. PTIR led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.