IVV vs QBTZ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF
Which is better, IVV or QBTZ?
Large Cap Blend against Trading-Inverse Debt.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QBTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.29% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 16 |
| YTD Return | +12.01%Best | -28.74% |
| 1Y Return | +16.48%Best | -69.72% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.21% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Defiance ETFs, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Trading-Inverse Debt |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 6, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs QBTZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs QBTZ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +16.48% while QBTZ returned -69.72%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.01% versus a loss of 28.74% for QBTZ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QBTZ charges 1.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $129 annually, a gap of $126 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for QBTZ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 1 in QBTZ, totalling 99.3% and 10.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 1 in QBTZ, against full books of 508 and 16.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and QBTZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QBTZ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QBTZ charges 1.29%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $126 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or QBTZ?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.48% vs -69.72% for QBTZ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QBTZ?
IVV yields 1.06% while QBTZ yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QBTZ better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.