QBTZ vs VXUS
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, QBTZ or VXUS?
Trading-Inverse Debt against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QBTZ | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.29% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 16 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | -28.49% | +14.48%Best |
| 1Y Return | -69.62% | +22.28%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.00% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.91% |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Debt | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 6, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
QBTZ vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QBTZ vs VXUS Performance
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QBTZ returned -69.62% while VXUS returned +22.28%. Year to date, QBTZ is down 28.49% versus a gain of 14.48% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QBTZ charges 1.29% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $129 vs $5 annually, a gap of $124 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QBTZ currently yields 0.00% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in QBTZ and 8,091 in VXUS, totalling 10.6% and 87.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, QBTZ as of Sep 1, 2026 and VXUS as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in QBTZ and 8,091 in VXUS, against full books of 16 and 8,747.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QBTZ and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QBTZ or VXUS?
QBTZ has an expense ratio of 1.29% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $124 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QBTZ or VXUS?
Over the past year QBTZ returned -69.62% vs +22.28% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QBTZ or VXUS?
QBTZ yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than QBTZ?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.