IVV vs QQQT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QQQT delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QQQT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.20% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $50M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 20.93% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +15.76% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +23.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 17.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -22.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Defiance ETFs, LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 18, 2024 |
IVV vs QQQT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) is a ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while QQQT returned +23.39%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 15.76% for QQQT.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -22.5% for QQQT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QQQT charges 1.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $120 annually, a gap of $117 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 20.93% for QQQT.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QQQT share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QQQT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQQT charges 1.20%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $117 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QQQT?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +23.39% for QQQT, so QQQT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +17.87% for QQQT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QQQT?
QQQT has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QQQT -22.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and QQQT?
IVV and QQQT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QQQT?
IVV and QQQT share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QQQT?
IVV yields 1.10% while QQQT yields 20.93%, so QQQT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.