IVV vs RPAR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs RPAR Risk Parity ETF
Which is better, IVV or RPAR?
Large Cap Blend against Debt-oriented balanced.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RPAR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.52% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $581M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 508 | 138 |
| YTD Return | +11.57%Best | +3.50% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | +8.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71%Best | +9.14% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80%Best | +0.50% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 13.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9% | -30.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,262Best | $10,253 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Rpar ETF |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Debt-oriented balanced |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 12, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 13, 2019 to Sep 10, 2026 (6.7 years).
IVV vs RPAR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.7 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RPAR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) is an ETF from Rpar ETF. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while RPAR returned +8.17%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 3.50% for RPAR.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.71% per year against +9.14% for RPAR; over five years the annualized figures are +12.80% and +0.50% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +15.07% annualized vs +3.75%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 13.3% for RPAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -30.2% for RPAR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RPAR charges 0.52%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $52 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 2.37% for RPAR.
Holdings Overlap
At least 2.8% of IVV's money is in holdings RPAR also owns.
Stated as a floor: for RPAR, our book for it covers 52.4% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and RPAR share little of their money.
20 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 130 in RPAR, against full books of 508 and 138.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RPAR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 0.94% | 1.33% | 0.39% |
| DEDeere & Co. | 0.23% | 1.28% | 1.05% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 0.52% | 0.78% | 0.26% |
| FCXFreeport-McMoran Copper & Gold Inc | 0.15% | 0.44% | 0.29% |
| COPConocophillips Co | 0.21% | 0.29% | 0.08% |
| CTVACorteva Inc. | 0.08% | 0.39% | 0.31% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 0.11% | 0.18% | 0.07% |
| ECLEcolab, Inc. | 0.11% | 0.18% | 0.07% |
| DVNDevon Energy Corp. | 0.07% | 0.14% | 0.07% |
| OXYOccidental Petroleum Corp. | 0.06% | 0.13% | 0.07% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and RPAR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RPAR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RPAR charges 0.52%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $49 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RPAR?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +8.17% for RPAR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IVV annualized +15.07% vs +3.75% for RPAR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RPAR?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 13.3% for RPAR. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs RPAR -30.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and RPAR?
IVV and RPAR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RPAR?
At least 2.8% of IVV's money is in holdings RPAR also owns. Our book for RPAR is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 130 in RPAR.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RPAR?
IVV yields 1.06% while RPAR yields 2.37%, so RPAR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RPAR better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.