IVV vs RSMC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Rockefeller US Small-Mid Cap ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RSMC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $758M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 47 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +13.93% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +14.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 15.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -22.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Rockefeller Capital Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 10, 2024 |
IVV vs RSMC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Rockefeller US Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) is a ETF from Rockefeller Capital Management. Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while RSMC returned +14.63%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 13.93% for RSMC.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSMC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -22.3% for RSMC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RSMC charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for RSMC.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and RSMC share 1 holdings out of 550 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RSMC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NDSN | 0.02% | 2.29% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RSMC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RSMC charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or RSMC?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +14.63% for RSMC, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +7.71% for RSMC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or RSMC?
RSMC has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RSMC -22.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and RSMC?
IVV and RSMC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RSMC?
IVV and RSMC share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 550 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RSMC?
IVV yields 1.09% while RSMC yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.