IVV vs RSMC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Rockefeller US Small-Mid Cap ETF
Which is better, IVV or RSMC?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. RSMC is less concentrated, with 31.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RSMC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $761M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 47 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | +8.41% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | +4.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 15.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -22.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $13,386Best | $10,884 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 31.1%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Rockefeller Capital Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 10, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 11, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.9 years).
IVV vs RSMC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RSMC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Rockefeller US Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) is an ETF from Rockefeller Capital Management. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while RSMC returned +4.08%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 8.41% for RSMC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSMC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 12.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -22.3% for RSMC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RSMC charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for RSMC.
Holdings Overlap
2.0% of RSMC's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
RSMC and IVV share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 45 in RSMC, against full books of 508 and 47.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 490 and 45 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 481 positions RSMC does not, 98.6% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.07%, AAPL 7.02%, MSFT 5.69%, AMZN 3.84%, GOOGL 3.00%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RSMC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NDSNNordson Corp | 0.03% | 1.96% | 1.93% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and RSMC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RSMC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RSMC charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RSMC?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +4.08% for RSMC, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +16.59% vs +4.56% for RSMC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RSMC?
RSMC has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 12.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs RSMC -22.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and RSMC?
IVV and RSMC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RSMC?
2.0% of RSMC's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.0% of RSMC's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 45 in RSMC.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RSMC?
IVV yields 1.06% while RSMC yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSMC better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. RSMC is less concentrated, with 31.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.