IVV vs SDVD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
Which is better, IVV or SDVD?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. SDVD is less concentrated, with 10.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SDVD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.85% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $912M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 8.14% |
| Holdings | 508 | 175 |
| YTD Return | +12.27%Best | +5.04% |
| 1Y Return | +17.04%Best | +7.30% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.24%Best | +5.23% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.08% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 22.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -29.1% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $17,780Best | $11,246 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 10.5%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 10, 2023 to Sep 17, 2026 (3.1 years).
IVV vs SDVD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SDVD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (SDVD) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% while SDVD returned +7.30%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.27% versus a gain of 5.04% for SDVD.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.24% per year against +5.23% for SDVD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SDVD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 12.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -29.1% for SDVD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SDVD charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $85 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 8.14% for SDVD.
Holdings Overlap
1.6% of IVV's money is in holdings SDVD also owns. 22.9% of SDVD's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
SDVD and IVV share little of their money.
39 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 172 in SDVD, against full books of 508 and 175.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 130 positions for SDVD that do not appear in our book for IVV (74.4% of the fund), and 443 for IVV that do not appear in SDVD (97.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SDVD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBKRInteractive Brokers Group Inc | 0.07% | 1.13% | 1.06% |
| FIXComfort Systems USA Inc. | 0.08% | 0.97% | 0.89% |
| AIZAssurant, Inc. | 0.02% | 1.00% | 0.98% |
| WSMWilliams-sonoma Inc | 0.04% | 0.96% | 0.92% |
| VRSNVerisign Inc. | 0.04% | 0.91% | 0.87% |
| NTAPNetapp Inc | 0.06% | 0.87% | 0.81% |
| EMEEmcor Group Inc | 0.05% | 0.87% | 0.82% |
| SNASnap-On Inc. | 0.03% | 0.89% | 0.86% |
| FOXAFox Corp. Class A | 0.02% | 0.90% | 0.88% |
| CINFCincinnati Financial Corp. | 0.04% | 0.87% | 0.83% |
22.9% of SDVD is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SDVD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SDVD charges 0.85%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SDVD?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% vs +7.30% for SDVD, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SDVD?
SDVD has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 12.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs SDVD -29.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and SDVD?
IVV and SDVD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SDVD?
22.9% of SDVD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 22.9% of SDVD's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 172 in SDVD.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SDVD?
IVV yields 1.06% while SDVD yields 8.14%, so SDVD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SDVD better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. SDVD is less concentrated, with 10.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.