IVV vs SDVY
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
Which is better, IVV or SDVY?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SDVY is less concentrated, with 10.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SDVY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.58% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $11.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.96% |
| Holdings | 508 | 348 |
| YTD Return | +11.03%Best | +8.68% |
| 1Y Return | +15.62%Best | +11.56% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.81%Best | +15.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.61%Best | +9.69% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3%Best | 22.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -45.2% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,109Best | $15,879 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 10.5%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 2, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 3, 2017 to Sep 16, 2026 (8.9 years).
IVV vs SDVY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SDVY Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (SDVY) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% while SDVY returned +11.56%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.03% versus a gain of 8.68% for SDVY.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.81% per year against +15.04% for SDVY; over five years the annualized figures are +12.61% and +9.69% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.79% annualized vs +9.91%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SDVY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.1% compared with 16.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -45.2% for SDVY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SDVY charges 0.58%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $58 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.96% for SDVY.
Holdings Overlap
1.6% of IVV's money is in holdings SDVY also owns. 23.0% of SDVY's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
SDVY and IVV share little of their money.
39 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 172 in SDVY, against full books of 508 and 348.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 130 positions for SDVY that do not appear in our book for IVV (73.9% of the fund), and 443 for IVV that do not appear in SDVY (97.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SDVY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBKRInteractive Brokers Group Inc | 0.07% | 1.13% | 1.06% |
| FIXComfort Systems USA Inc. | 0.08% | 0.97% | 0.89% |
| AIZAssurant, Inc. | 0.02% | 1.00% | 0.98% |
| WSMWilliams-sonoma Inc | 0.04% | 0.96% | 0.92% |
| VRSNVerisign Inc. | 0.04% | 0.92% | 0.88% |
| NTAPNetapp Inc | 0.06% | 0.87% | 0.81% |
| EMEEmcor Group Inc | 0.05% | 0.87% | 0.82% |
| SNASnap-On Inc. | 0.03% | 0.89% | 0.86% |
| FOXAFox Corp. Class A | 0.02% | 0.90% | 0.88% |
| CINFCincinnati Financial Corp. | 0.04% | 0.87% | 0.83% |
23.0% of SDVY is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SDVY?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SDVY charges 0.58%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SDVY?
Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% vs +11.56% for SDVY, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IVV annualized +13.79% vs +9.91% for SDVY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SDVY?
SDVY has been the more volatile fund at 22.1% annualized versus 16.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs SDVY -45.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and SDVY?
IVV and SDVY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SDVY?
23.0% of SDVY's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 23.0% of SDVY's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 172 in SDVY.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SDVY?
IVV yields 1.06% while SDVY yields 0.96%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SDVY better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SDVY is less concentrated, with 10.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.