IVV vs SMCO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SMCO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.55% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $148M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.91% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 64 | |
| YTD Return | +12.76% | +8.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.63% | +11.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.71% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.87% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 15.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -22.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Hilton Capital Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 28, 2023 |
IVV vs SMCO Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF (SMCO) is a ETF from Hilton Capital Management. Over the past year IVV returned +20.63% while SMCO returned +11.79%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.76% versus a gain of 8.31% for SMCO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SMCO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -22.7% for SMCO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SMCO charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $55 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.91% for SMCO.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SMCO share 14 holdings out of 554 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SMCO?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SMCO charges 0.55%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SMCO?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.63% vs +11.79% for SMCO, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +6.99% vs +15.74% for SMCO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SMCO?
SMCO has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SMCO -22.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and SMCO?
IVV and SMCO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SMCO?
IVV and SMCO share 14 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 554 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SMCO?
IVV yields 1.10% while SMCO yields 0.91%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.