IVV vs SNK
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs GraniteShares 2x Short SpaceX Daily ETF
Which is better, IVV or SNK?
Large Cap Blend against Trading-Inverse Equity.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SNK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 2.20% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $62M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 4 |
| YTD Return | +12.15%Best | -9.84% |
| 1Y Return | +14.42%Best | -9.84% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.09% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.36% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2%Best | 95.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -71.8% |
| $10,000 over 16.3 years | $76,440Best | $14,235 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | GraniteShares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Trading-Inverse Equity |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 15, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 16.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 12, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 (16.3 years).
IVV vs SNK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.3 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SNK Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and GraniteShares 2x Short SpaceX Daily ETF (SNK) is an ETF from GraniteShares. Over the past year IVV returned +14.42% while SNK returned -9.84%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.15% versus a loss of 9.84% for SNK.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SNK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 95.1% compared with 14.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -71.8% for SNK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.02. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SNK charges 2.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $220 annually, a gap of $217 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for SNK.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and SNK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SNK?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SNK charges 2.20%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $217 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SNK?
Over the past year IVV returned +14.42% vs -9.84% for SNK, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IVV annualized +13.29% vs +2.19% for SNK. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SNK?
SNK has been the more volatile fund at 95.1% annualized versus 14.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs SNK -71.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and SNK?
IVV and SNK have a monthly-return correlation of -0.02, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SNK?
IVV yields 1.10% while SNK yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SNK better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.