SCHD vs SNK
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs GraniteShares 2x Short SpaceX Daily ETF
Which is better, SCHD or SNK?
Large Cap Value against Trading-Inverse Equity.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | SNK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 2.20% |
| AUM | $111.6B | $62M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.24% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 206 | 4 |
| YTD Return | +26.92%Best | -3.74% |
| 1Y Return | +33.81%Best | -3.74% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.21% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.94% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7%Best | 140.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4%Best | -71.8% |
| $10,000 over 15 years | $50,498Best | $13,759 |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | GraniteShares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Trading-Inverse Equity |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Jun 15, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 15 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2011 to Oct 16, 2026 (15 years).
SCHD vs SNK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15 years both funds cover.
SCHD vs SNK Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and GraniteShares 2x Short SpaceX Daily ETF (SNK) is an ETF from GraniteShares. Over the past year SCHD returned +33.81% while SNK returned -3.74%. Year to date, SCHD is up 26.92% versus a loss of 3.74% for SNK.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SNK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 140.6% compared with 13.7% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -71.8% for SNK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while SNK charges 2.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $220 annually, a gap of $214 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.24% against 0.00% for SNK.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCHD and SNK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or SNK?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while SNK charges 2.20%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $214 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCHD or SNK?
Over the past year SCHD returned +33.81% vs -3.74% for SNK, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SCHD annualized +11.40% vs +2.15% for SNK. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCHD or SNK?
SNK has been the more volatile fund at 140.6% annualized versus 13.7% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -33.4% vs SNK -71.8%.
Should I hold both SCHD and SNK?
SCHD and SNK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or SNK?
SCHD yields 3.24% while SNK yields 0.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SNK better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.