IVV vs STXK
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Strive Small-Cap ETF
Which is better, IVV or STXK?
Large Cap Blend against Small Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. STXK is less concentrated, with 4.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | STXK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $85M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.15% |
| Holdings | 508 | 603 |
| YTD Return | +12.01%Best | +11.62% |
| 1Y Return | +16.48%Best | +14.25% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.21%Best | +14.44% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.0%Best | 18.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -27.1% |
| $10,000 over 3.8 years | $20,242Best | $15,529 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 4.0%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Strive Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 10, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 17, 2022 to Sep 14, 2026 (3.8 years).
IVV vs STXK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.8 years both funds cover.
IVV vs STXK Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) is an ETF from Strive Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +16.48% while STXK returned +14.25%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.01% versus a gain of 11.62% for STXK.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.21% per year against +14.44% for STXK. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +20.39% annualized vs +12.28%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
STXK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 13.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -27.1% for STXK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while STXK charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $18 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.15% for STXK.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings STXK also owns. 0.2% of STXK's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
2 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 595 in STXK, against full books of 508 and 603.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 573 positions for STXK that do not appear in our book for IVV (96.6% of the fund), and 480 for IVV that do not appear in STXK (98.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and STXK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or STXK?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while STXK charges 0.18%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or STXK?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.48% vs +14.25% for STXK, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +20.39% vs +12.28% for STXK. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or STXK?
STXK has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 13.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs STXK -27.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and STXK?
IVV and STXK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or STXK?
IVV yields 1.06% while STXK yields 1.15%, so STXK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is STXK better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. STXK is less concentrated, with 4.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.