IVV vs TENM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF
Which is better, IVV or TENM?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TENM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $46M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.27% |
| Holdings | 508 | 8 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | +8.87% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | +11.00% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 21, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs TENM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs TENM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF (TENM) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while TENM returned +11.00%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 8.87% for TENM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TENM charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.27% for TENM.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings TENM also owns.
Stated as a floor: for TENM, our book for it covers 104.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 2 in TENM, against full books of 508 and 8.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in TENM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLABlackrock Cash Funds: Treasury, Sl Agency Shares | 0.15% | 0.81% | 0.66% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and TENM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TENM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TENM charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TENM?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +11.00% for TENM, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TENM?
IVV yields 1.06% while TENM yields 0.27%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TENM better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.