IVV vs TMFX
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Motley Fool Next Index ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TMFX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $33M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.05% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 191 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +11.35% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +15.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | +15.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 20.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Motley Fool Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 30, 2021 |
IVV vs TMFX Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) is a ETF from Motley Fool Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while TMFX returned +15.90%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 11.35% for TMFX.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.55% per year against +15.40% for TMFX. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TMFX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -34.3% for TMFX. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TMFX charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.05% for TMFX.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TMFX share 35 holdings out of 660 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TMFX?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TMFX charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TMFX?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +15.90% for TMFX, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +4.38% for TMFX. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TMFX?
TMFX has been the more volatile fund at 20.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TMFX -34.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and TMFX?
IVV and TMFX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TMFX?
IVV and TMFX share 35 common holdings with a 1.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 660 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TMFX?
IVV yields 1.09% while TMFX yields 0.05%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.