IVV vs TMH
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TMH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.19% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $1M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 17.29% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 2 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | -9.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +9.11% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 24.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -27.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ADRH | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 13, 2025 |
IVV vs TMH Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) is a ETF from ADRH. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while TMH returned +9.11%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a loss of 9.18% for TMH.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TMH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -27.5% for TMH. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.07. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TMH charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $19 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 17.29% for TMH.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TMH share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TMH?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TMH charges 0.19%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TMH?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +9.11% for TMH, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +11.20% for TMH. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TMH?
TMH has been the more volatile fund at 24.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TMH -27.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and TMH?
IVV and TMH have a monthly-return correlation of -0.07, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TMH?
IVV and TMH share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TMH?
IVV yields 1.09% while TMH yields 17.29%, so TMH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.