IVV vs TPYP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Tortoise North American Pipeline ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. TPYP delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TPYP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.40% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $871M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 3.20% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 45 | |
| YTD Return | +12.96% | +0.92% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.70% | +27.54% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.10% | +15.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.40% | +21.69% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 21.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -52.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | TortoiseEcofin Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 29, 2015 |
IVV vs TPYP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Tortoise North American Pipeline ETF (TPYP) is a ETF from TortoiseEcofin Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +20.70% while TPYP returned +27.54%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.96% versus a gain of 0.92% for TPYP.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.10% per year against +15.81% for TPYP; over five years the annualized figures are +13.40% and +21.69% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, TPYP has the edge at +8.22% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TPYP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -52.0% for TPYP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TPYP charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $40 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 3.20% for TPYP.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TPYP share 6 holdings out of 543 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TPYP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TPYP charges 0.40%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TPYP?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.70% vs +27.54% for TPYP, so TPYP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), IVV annualized +7.01% vs +8.22% for TPYP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TPYP?
TPYP has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TPYP -52.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and TPYP?
IVV and TPYP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TPYP?
IVV and TPYP share 6 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 543 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TPYP?
IVV yields 1.10% while TPYP yields 3.20%, so TPYP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.