IVV vs TSLR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TSLR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $64M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 2 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | -50.89% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | -27.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | -16.39% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 104.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -82.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | GraniteShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 21, 2023 |
IVV vs TSLR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) is a ETF from GraniteShares. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while TSLR returned -27.78%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a loss of 50.89% for TSLR.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against -16.39% for TSLR. Across the full 3-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs -16.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TSLR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 104.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -82.8% for TSLR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TSLR charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for TSLR.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TSLR share 1 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in TSLR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSLA | 1.65% | 66.69% | 65.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TSLR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TSLR charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TSLR?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs -27.78% for TSLR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs -16.39% for TSLR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TSLR?
TSLR has been the more volatile fund at 104.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TSLR -82.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and TSLR?
IVV and TSLR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TSLR?
IVV and TSLR share 1 common holdings with a 1.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TSLR?
IVV yields 1.09% while TSLR yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.