TSLR vs VYM
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 568 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TSLR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $64M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -50.89% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | -27.78% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -16.39% | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 104.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -82.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 21, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
TSLR vs VYM Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TSLR returned -27.78% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, TSLR is down 50.89% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Over three years, TSLR compounded at -16.39% per year against +18.60% for VYM. Across the full 3-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.11% annualized vs -16.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TSLR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 104.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -82.8% for TSLR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.20. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TSLR charges 0.95% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $4 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TSLR currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
TSLR and VYM share 0 holdings out of 559 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TSLR or VYM?
TSLR has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TSLR or VYM?
Over the past year TSLR returned -27.78% vs +24.43% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), TSLR annualized -16.39% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TSLR or VYM?
TSLR has been the more volatile fund at 104.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: TSLR -82.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both TSLR and VYM?
TSLR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.20, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TSLR and VYM?
TSLR and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 559 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TSLR or VYM?
TSLR yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.