IVV vs VDI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Virtus International Dividend ETF
Which is better, IVV or VDI?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. VDI is less concentrated, with 20.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | VDI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.39% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $17M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 508 | 114 |
| YTD Return | +11.57% | +18.12%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.57% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 20.0%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Virtus Investment Partners |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 2, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs VDI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs VDI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Virtus International Dividend ETF (VDI) is an ETF from Virtus Investment Partners. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 18.12% for VDI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while VDI charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $39 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 2.22% for VDI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 505 holdings in IVV and 111 in VDI, totalling 100.0% and 98.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 111 in VDI, against full books of 508 and 114.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 2 positions for VDI that do not appear in our book for IVV (1.2% of the fund), and 495 for IVV that do not appear in VDI (99.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and VDI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or VDI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VDI charges 0.39%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VDI?
IVV yields 1.06% while VDI yields 2.22%, so VDI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VDI better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. VDI is less concentrated, with 20.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.