IVV vs VTWG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. VTWG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTWG offers more diversification with 1,125 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | VTWG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $1.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.61% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 1,125 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +17.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +30.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +18.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | +6.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 20.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -42.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 20, 2010 |
IVV vs VTWG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while VTWG returned +30.17%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 17.28% for VTWG.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.81% per year against +18.79% for VTWG; over five years the annualized figures are +13.05% and +6.54% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTWG has the edge at +11.39% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTWG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -42.1% for VTWG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while VTWG charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $6 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.61% for VTWG.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or VTWG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VTWG charges 0.06%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or VTWG?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +30.17% for VTWG, so VTWG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +11.39% for VTWG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or VTWG?
VTWG has been the more volatile fund at 20.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs VTWG -42.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and VTWG?
IVV and VTWG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and VTWG?
IVV and VTWG share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1627 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VTWG?
IVV yields 1.10% while VTWG yields 0.61%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.