IVV vs VVR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco Senior Income Trust
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VVR offers more diversification with 525 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | VVR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 5.26% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $1,117.8 | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 12.77% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 525 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | -1.98% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | -7.40% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +3.42% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | +4.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -81.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 24, 1998 |
IVV vs VVR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco Senior Income Trust (VVR) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while VVR returned -7.40%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a loss of 1.98% for VVR.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.81% per year against +3.42% for VVR; over five years the annualized figures are +13.05% and +4.33% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs -2.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.9% for VVR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -81.8% for VVR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while VVR charges 5.26%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $526 annually, a gap of $523 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 12.77% for VVR.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and VVR share 0 holdings out of 643 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or VVR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VVR charges 5.26%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $523 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or VVR?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs -7.40% for VVR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs -2.14% for VVR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or VVR?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.9% for VVR. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs VVR -81.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and VVR?
IVV and VVR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and VVR?
IVV and VVR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 643 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VVR?
IVV yields 1.10% while VVR yields 12.77%, so VVR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.