VVR vs VXUS
Invesco Senior Income Trust vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VVR | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 5.26% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $1,117.8 | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 13.04% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 525 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -1.98% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | -7.70% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.50% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.34% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -81.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 1998 | Jan 26, 2011 |
VVR vs VXUS Performance
Invesco Senior Income Trust (VVR) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VVR returned -7.70% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, VVR is down 1.98% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, VVR compounded at +3.50% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +4.34% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs -2.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.9% for VVR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -81.8% for VVR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VVR charges 5.26% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $526 vs $5 annually, a gap of $521 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VVR currently yields 13.04% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
VVR and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7999 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VVR or VXUS?
VVR has an expense ratio of 5.26% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $521 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VVR or VXUS?
Over the past year VVR returned -7.70% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VVR annualized -2.14% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VVR or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.9% for VVR. Worst drawdown: VVR -81.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both VVR and VXUS?
VVR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VVR and VXUS?
VVR and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7999 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VVR or VXUS?
VVR yields 13.04% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VVR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.