IVV vs WBIG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. WBIG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WBIG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.59% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $30M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.21% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 77 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +14.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +21.85% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | +7.05% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | +1.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 11.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -25.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | WBI Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 25, 2014 |
IVV vs WBIG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF (WBIG) is a ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while WBIG returned +21.85%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 14.44% for WBIG.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.55% per year against +7.05% for WBIG; over five years the annualized figures are +13.27% and +1.51% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +1.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.3% for WBIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -25.3% for WBIG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WBIG charges 1.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $159 annually, a gap of $156 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.21% for WBIG.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and WBIG share 55 holdings out of 530 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WBIG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WBIG charges 1.59%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $156 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or WBIG?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +21.85% for WBIG, so WBIG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +1.42% for WBIG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or WBIG?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.3% for WBIG. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs WBIG -25.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and WBIG?
IVV and WBIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WBIG?
IVV and WBIG share 55 common holdings with a 7.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 530 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WBIG?
IVV yields 1.09% while WBIG yields 1.21%, so WBIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.