IVV vs WDIV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WDIV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.40% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $276M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 4.29% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 128 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +13.06% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +22.42% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +18.32% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | +8.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -44.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 29, 2013 |
IVV vs WDIV Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while WDIV returned +22.42%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 13.06% for WDIV.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +18.32% for WDIV; over five years the annualized figures are +13.26% and +8.96% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +4.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.7% for WDIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -44.5% for WDIV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WDIV charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $40 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 4.29% for WDIV.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and WDIV share 6 holdings out of 593 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WDIV?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WDIV charges 0.40%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or WDIV?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +22.42% for WDIV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +4.46% for WDIV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or WDIV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.7% for WDIV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs WDIV -44.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and WDIV?
IVV and WDIV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WDIV?
IVV and WDIV share 6 common holdings with a 0.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 593 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WDIV?
IVV yields 1.09% while WDIV yields 4.29%, so WDIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.