IVV vs WLDR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Simplify Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
Which is better, IVV or WLDR?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, WLDR over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WLDR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.67% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $98M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.26% |
| Holdings | 508 | 117 |
| YTD Return | +11.57% | +32.33%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.57% | +43.90%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71% | +31.94%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80% | +19.13%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4%Best | 18.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -47.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,262 | $23,994Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 38.2% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Simplify Exchange Traded Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 16, 2018 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 17, 2018 to Sep 10, 2026 (8.6 years).
IVV vs WLDR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs WLDR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Simplify Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) is an ETF from Simplify Exchange Traded Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while WLDR returned +43.90%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 32.33% for WLDR.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.71% per year against +31.94% for WLDR; over five years the annualized figures are +12.80% and +19.13% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.19% annualized vs +11.57%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WLDR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 16.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -47.1% for WLDR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WLDR charges 0.67%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $67 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.26% for WLDR.
Holdings Overlap
7.5% of IVV's money is in holdings WLDR also owns. 68.3% of WLDR's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
53 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 112 in WLDR, against full books of 508 and 117.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 8 positions for WLDR that do not appear in our book for IVV (5.7% of the fund), and 442 for IVV that do not appear in WLDR (91.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in WLDR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.51% | 6.81% | 5.30% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc. | 0.20% | 7.73% | 7.53% |
| STXSeagate Technology Plc | 0.28% | 5.42% | 5.14% |
| HPQHp Inc. | 0.04% | 4.69% | 4.65% |
| JBLJabil, Inc. | 0.05% | 3.40% | 3.35% |
| VZVerizon Communications, Inc. | 0.29% | 2.39% | 2.10% |
| OMCOmnicom Group Inc. | 0.04% | 2.49% | 2.45% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 0.93% | 1.47% | 0.54% |
| TAt&t, Inc. | 0.24% | 2.11% | 1.87% |
| TGTTarget Corp. | 0.10% | 1.60% | 1.50% |
68.3% of WLDR is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WLDR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WLDR charges 0.67%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $64 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or WLDR?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +43.90% for WLDR, so WLDR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IVV annualized +13.19% vs +11.57% for WLDR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or WLDR?
WLDR has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 16.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs WLDR -47.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and WLDR?
IVV and WLDR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WLDR?
68.3% of WLDR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 68.3% of WLDR's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 53 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 112 in WLDR.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WLDR?
IVV yields 1.06% while WLDR yields 1.26%, so WLDR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WLDR better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, WLDR over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.