IVV vs WTIB
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs USCF Oil Plus Bitcoin Strategy Fund
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WTIB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.93% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $481,589.07 | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 4 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +27.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | - | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | - | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -47.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | USCF Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 10, 2025 |
IVV vs WTIB Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and USCF Oil Plus Bitcoin Strategy Fund (WTIB) is a ETF from USCF Investments. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 27.72% for WTIB.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -47.6% for WTIB. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WTIB charges 0.93%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $93 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for WTIB.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WTIB?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WTIB charges 0.93%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $90 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WTIB?
IVV yields 1.09% while WTIB yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.